Skip to main content

1/18 - Interest Groups

Moving from the topic of race and segregation, this country of ours, is known to have some failures elsewhere as well. The problem I am addressing is economically. This country faced what is known as the Great Depression. It inspired civilians to feel just as the name implicates. With financial crisis on the rise, as well as the recovery from World War I, we needed a leader who knew what he was doing. President Herbert Hoover was not the guy. If anything, he not only initiated the Great Depression, bu his solution was to do absolutely nothing. Luckily, “the new deal was forced to turn to marginal intellectuals for the guidance and council it required”.

The Great Depression brought about a time of death and rebirth, in a sense ,for our country. During the Depression, our president believed the economic depression could not be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement. How insane is that? As president of the United States, it was his given duty to use his authority to utilize the government. What are these branches there for if not to protect us? He should have used the legislative branch to allow himself to pass laws that would better our nation. He should have used the executive powers to exercise his authority and make sure things were going according to plan, but he was unable to organize such a thing. He was very much in the wrong.

Things were able to work themselves out with the helping hand of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He came along with a new deal that would bring about relief, recovery and reform. Unlike Hoover, Roosevelt utilized the legislative and executive branch’s authority. He put laws into place to bring about a change. He closed down the banks to conduct formal investigations, and reassured the people through the radio that he would solve our crisis. He created new government agencies, as well as passed a second new deal that expanded the role of the federal government, saving the economy from getting much worse. Seems like more thought should go into electing our president besides how it will effect our pocket. It is extremely important to hear their ideas on how they plan to use the government to bring about a change for the.greater good.

Comments

  1. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was president for four terms, the only president in history to be elected for four terms showing how a good president can inspire people to go out and vote. FDR success as a good president is how he reduced the rate of unemployment and his New Deal Program of Relief, Recovery, and Reform helped millions of Americans to survive the Great Depression. Another example was Good Neighbor Policy to counteract the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, allowing the removal U.S. forces from Latin American countries like Haiti, Cuba, and Panama. FDR was a good president because he genuinely cared about the people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1/4 Citizenship & American Identity

     Being a born U.S. citizen you dont really consider the implications of how you’re viewed. Besides to underlying tone of racism, which is a topic in itself, I dont live day to day life fighting for my rights to be seen as a U.S. citizen, my right to live here, etc. I remember learning the Melting-Pot theory in a high school history art class, but to read it broken down as such was interesting. America claims to have this drawn out, wonderfully blended, equal opportunity life style, but along with that comes implications of the government since it is they who have the power. Also there is this idea of Americanism. This brings me to my quote. “Surely we cannot be certain of our spiritual democracy when, claiming to melt the nations within us to a comprehension of our free and democratic institutions, we fly into panic at the first sign of their own will and tendency.”      America has this self implicated idea that it is like a melting pot. A melting po...

1/8 - Debating the Constitution

Politics can be described in a variety of ways, usually depending on who it is giving the definition. In a general sense, it can be explained as conflicts between educated, commercial, and the underlying populations. What can be assumed in these conflicts are issues of power. Who obtains it and how it is used to influence the nation. This is an ongoing issue between, “The involved and the isolated”. Thomas Jefferson is known to have represented Americans, while guaranteeing the use of, “older ethics”. In my humbled opinion, Jefferson has away with words, as most people in his position do, which comes across to the underlying populations as someone to support. A quote by Jefferson follows; “Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life are dreary things.” Yes I agree with those words, but he seems to contradict himself several times. In using this quote, he was attempting to push his agenda towards America institutionalizing frat...